Hear From a Winning Warshafsky Attorney
Corporations Forsake Kids for Money
Victor Harding | 60 sec
I‘m Victor Harding. If you’re injured, it IS about the money.
People and corporations make mistakes. They can even be reckless in designing and bringing products to market. The Warshafsky firm tried a case where manufacturers were willing to sacrifice children to save expenses. Think about that - forsake kids for money. Warshafsky firm has imposed such punitive expenses on negligent and reckless manufacturers as have changed entire industries.
If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, been abused by someone in authority, or have suffered the impact of business forsaking human beings for dollar bills, I’m proud to tell you the world is a safer place because of the Warshafsky law firm. The big shots who make money decisions value your claim based on your attorney. With Warshafsky your claim will be a high-risk monetary proposition for those big shots. If someone caused you, or God forbid your children, harm I’ll make them pay. Money.
INJURED? It IS About The Money.®
A Civil Action: The Real Story
“A Civil Action” is a New York Times Best Seller turned movie with John Travolta in the leading role. The true story of a lawyer bringing a civil suit on behalf of 8 families of childhood leukemia victims in Woburn, Massachusetts doubles as a lesson in lawyering.
The book depicts the idealistic young attorney Jan Schlictmann as a Porsche-driving Captain Ahab, with the public acclaim from conquering the chemical corporations allegedly responsible for the leukemia as his elusive white whale.
The case would last 9 years and drive Schlictmann into personal bankruptcy. Although a settlement was reached, there was little for the plaintiffs to celebrate.
The 8 million dollar settlement was split between thirteen families—minus 2.2 million in legal fees (which didn’t even cover Schlictmann’s 2.6 million in expenses). Years after the settlement, Michael Keating, one of the attorneys for the chemical companies, commented:
"I felt that the clients didn't have the priority in [Schlictmann's] mind that they should have."
– (In the Shadow of Woburn, Boston Magazine, Sept. 2009)
A Civil Action Book vs Movie vs Reality: Anatomy Of A Failed Suit
Schlictmann’s trial strategy involved an expensive moonshot: Funding original cancer research to prove a causal link between pollutants dumped by the chemical companies and leukemia in neighborhood children. The likelihood of conclusive legal proof was deemed nil by medical experts. Still, Schlictmann pressed on, totally committed to finding a way to make it work, all the while wondering if it was even possible.
To make matters worse, Schlictmann could have settled for much more than what his clients ended up with, according to Keating. Before the trial started, Schlictmann had offered a $175 million deal to settle the case—a staggering amount in 1985. Schlictmann felt it would send a message to all corporations. Attorneys for the chemical companies promptly walked out of the room. As Keating recalls, they had come prepared to offer as much as $40 million, but Schlictmann’s brashness compelled them to take their chances in court.
In the end, Schlictmann settled with the companies for $8 million. His law firm had spent every last dime in their coffers and could no longer pursue litigation. Schlictmann, who put up his car and condominium as collateral to fund the case, lost both.
Lesson: Client First, Ego Second
In personal injury law, putting the client first means advising as to the most likely outcomes of each path--and being realistic about those potential outcomes. The goal must always be to do what’s best FOR THE CLIENT, not for the attorney, his firm, or anyone’s ego.
While Warshafsky Law is well known in legal circles for winning record-setting judgments and securing unprecedented settlements, we’ll be the first to tell you there’s a calculus to successful lawyering. The defendants in your case, along with their lawyers and insurers, need to know you have an attorney with a track record of going the distance at trial. You must maximize their risk and their perceptions of risk.
Knowing what to push for, how far to take things, and objectively weighing the impact of all possible outcomes is part and parcel of the job. And no one knows it better than the attorneys at Warshafsky Law.
Ted wouldn’t have it any other way.
Back to News